Part #/ Keyword
All Products

DIY: ZT-C1 vs VC890C+ Multimeter Test

2025-07-02 14:15:09Mr.Ming
twitter photos
twitter photos
twitter photos
DIY: ZT-C1 vs VC890C+ Multimeter Test

In the previous DIY article DIY: ZOYI ZT-C1 Teardown & Upgrade Guide, we covered the teardown of the ZT-C1 portable auto-ranging multimeter and how it can be upgraded to the ZT-C2. In this follow-up, we'll continue exploring this auto-ranging meter by comparing the performance of the ZY-C1 against the VC890C+ across various test ranges.

As shown in the image below, the ZT-C1 is noticeably more compact compared to the VC890C+.

image.png

When not in contact, the C1's voltage range returns to zero properly.

image.png

However, if you tap on the casing with your finger, the last digit on the C1 may jump around, while the VC890C+ doesn't have this issue. If this bothers you, you might consider adding shielding to the C1 later on.

image.png

Since there wasn't time to calibrate using a known voltage source, we compared it against the VC890C+ which was modified to display up to 9999. 

C1 has a 3999 display, and when measuring a voltage around 3.9V, it reads slightly higher than the VC890C+.

image.png

Next up is the measured voltage value during range switching on the C1.

image.png

It's clear that the 4V range switches down when the voltage drops below about 3.8V.

image.png

Measuring 220V AC also shows a reading that skews high.

image.png

Now let's move on to resistance testing.

All resistors tested are 0.01% tolerance and still within spec. Each was measured and then swapped for double-checking.

100.25Ω resistor: VC890C+ reads 100.3, C1 reads 100.9

image.png

3kΩ resistor: VC890C+ reads 3.001, C1 reads 2.991

image.png

89.8kΩ resistor: VC890C+ reads 89.91, C1 reads 89.4

image.png

9.9MΩ resistor: VC890C+ reads 9.907, C1 reads 9.87

image.png

Now for current testing.

Since the C1 only resolves down to 0.01mA, it can't measure the 25μA current.

image.png

At 2mA, the readings are fairly close.

image.png

At 72mA, the C1 still shows a slightly higher value.

image.png

Same goes for 170mA.

image.png

Next, in diode mode, shorting the probes correctly returns to zero.

image.png

Since the battery setup is 2xAA, an output of just over 2V is normal. However, this also means it can't drive high-power LED beads.

image.png

The VC890C+, modified with a lithium battery, outputs close to 3.3V.

image.png

Shorting the leads in resistance mode also returns to zero correctly.

image.png

Measuring the output voltage in resistance mode shows it's around 1V as expected.

image.png

Compared to the C1, the VC890C+ outputs slightly lower voltage in resistance mode.

image.png

When measuring frequency, the probe easily picks up 220V AC signals just by being near it.

image.png

Even without inserting the probe, placing it on a power strip still triggers detection, which indicates poor anti-interference capability.

image.png

A minor issue: after switching voltage ranges, the lowest available range becomes millivolts.

image.png

The main controller is likely the SD7830A by Huajing (Altek Corporation). Information such as pin functions, internal block diagrams, and application circuits can be found online.

From this comparison, the ZY-C1 tends to give slightly higher readings, with the largest deviation being around 1%. That said, a 1% error isn't a significant problem overall.

* Solemnly declare: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. The reprinted article is only for the purpose of disseminating more information. If the author's information is marked incorrectly, please contact us to modify or delete it as soon as possible. Thank you for your attention!